09 January 2015
WGC overstating Turkish gold reserves
In Koos Jansen’s latest post on the Turkish gold market, he has an interesting chart that shows that while the World Gold Council (WGC) has been reporting that the gold reserves of the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (CBRT) have increased from 116 tonnes to over 500 tonnes since late 2011, in actual fact CBRT has not bought any gold over that time.
It is a result of CBRT allowing Turkish banks to deposit gold with the central bank to meet their reserve requirements. Legally such gold is then owned by CBRT (as the Turkish banks are only holding a claim on their central bank for gold) so technically it is correct for the WGC to show it as reserves. However, I note that CBRT told Koos that gold so deposited “will show up in Central Bank balance … as “liability” to the bank which brought this gold”, so arguably the WGC should also take the liability side of a central bank’s balance sheet into account and only show the net gold position.
In effect what the WGC is doing is just looking at one side, the asset side. My problem with this is that most people are not aware of this CBRT policy and use the WGC gold reserves figures, and changes in them, as a way of gauging central bank demand for gold. Clearly in the case of Turkey the WGC figures are misleading to the majority of users and overstate central bank demand. I think it would be better for WGC to adjust the IMF figures to reflect the actual net gold owned by central banks and report any increases in gold held by a central bank against gold debts to its banks as a separate line item.
It is not as if the WGC is not aware of this issue, as on their quarterly reserves changes spreadsheet they say that “this table aims to show major changes in reported central bank reserves and the reason for the changes, which are not always the results of sales or purchases” and proceed to note the Turkish policy. Additionally, the do not include changes in CBRT’s reserves as central bank purchases in their commentary in their quarterly demand trends report.
You may then wonder if the WGC is doing this deliberately as it overstates central bank demand, helping their pro-gold agenda. The fact that they are more than willing to have the chart on this page default to include Turkey's inflated figures would support that view.
However I think it is more mundane than that. In the notes to their spreadsheet of central bank reserves it says that the data is “taken from the International Monetary Fund's International Financial Statistics (IFS) and other sources where applicable.” It is not like they are reviewing individual central bank reports, so it is just a case of not being bothered to review individual central bank annual reports and policies and make any appropriate adjustments (and its not as if they don’t make any adjustments, because in the notes they say that “where the WGC knows of movements that are not reported to the IMF or misprints, changes have been made”).
Whatever the reason, given the inconsistency in the way central banks report gold reserves, leases and swaps (see here) and the resulting potential for double counting, the WGC should not add to the confusion by failing to make simple adjustments. Consistency in the way they report data is essential to avoid the potential for misinterpretation on a topic as important as central bank demand for gold.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
The wonderful world of accounting.ReplyDelete
Congratulations on the material You write and post.
Regarding central bank reserves and reporting, I found - on a Hard Assets Alliance newsletter - a table ("Reported Central Bank Gold Purchases YTD" - sources: IMF and WGC) that the BoPortugal have bought 2,9 thousand troy onces in May 2014. I can´t find these numbers on any of the sources or BoPt site information or reports (as of last week).
Do You have any information on that? Or can You direct me to any other source?
Thank You in advance.
All the best in 2015,
LV, the only site I track is WGC's re-reporting of IMF data on CB reserves. That is quarterly and as of Q3 2014 only shows 1000oz added some time between Q4 2013 and Q1 2014.Delete
I'd defend the WGC here. They clearly state in all their demand estimates that they exclude the CBT's additions and have done so since the policy was introduced. All it really needs is an asterisk on that chart.ReplyDelete
The confusion... I will wait for more info on BoPortugal´s side. An e-mail is due, I guess. And I find something of interest I´ll share.
Keep up the good work.
All the best for 2015.